**Maximizing TMR Mixer Efficiency: Choosing the Right Bale Size and Characteristics for Optimal Performance**
**Introduction**
As we approach the haying season, it’s crucial for TMR mixer users to consider the impact of bale size and characteristics on mixer efficiency. By optimizing these factors, you can improve the performance of your mixer and achieve better nutritional results.
**The Impact of Bale Size and Characteristics**
Traditional bale feeders have prioritized large bale sizes (e.g., 6’x5′) for cost-efficiency. However, TMR feeding requires a shift in focus to optimizing batch size and meeting nutritional needs. Smaller bales can enable full-bale feeding, mixing of different quality bales, and the use of smaller mixers, reducing overall capital costs.
**Capacity Dictated by Hay Density**
The capacity of a TMR mixer is determined primarily by the weight of the hay on a dry hay equivalent (HE) basis. Long hay has a density of approximately 3 pounds per cubic foot (cu. ft.), which doubles to 6-7 pounds per cu. ft. when processed.
To prevent spillage, the mixer’s capacity should be at least 50% greater than the HE volume of the bale. For example, a 1000 lb. bale requires a mixer with a capacity of at least 450-500 cu. ft.
**Processing Multiple Bales**
Most mixers can satisfactorily process two bales or HE equivalent at a time. Adding a third bale generally increases processing time significantly. This is because the lower-density long hay tends to “float” on the denser processed hay, hindering mixing and cutting.
**Factors Affecting Bale Weight**
Bale weight is influenced by its size, density, and moisture content. Standard balers pack hay at 10-12 pounds per cu. ft., while high-density and knife-equipped balers can achieve densities of 16-18 pounds per cu. ft. Wet forage has a lower weight on an HE basis, but may settle more easily in the mixer.
**Effects of Mixer Dimensions and Number of Augers**
The physical space between the auger and mixer wall affects bale handling. Smaller mixers may limit the amount of hay that can fall into the cutting zone. Twin-auger mixers provide a larger space, but the HE weight limitation remains the same.
**Recommended Mixer Sizes**
Table 1 provides guidelines for recommended mixer sizes based on bale size and density:
| Bale Size | Mixer Capacity (cu. ft.) |
|—|—|
| 4×4 | 300-400 |
| 4×5 | 450-600 |
| 4×6 (standard density) | 450-600 |
| 5×6 (standard density) | 650+ |
| 4×6 (high density) | 650+ |
**Benefits of Using an Optimal Mixer**
Using the correct mixer size for your bale size and characteristics offers several benefits:
* Reduced capital cost for smaller mixers
* Improved mixing efficiency
* Better nutritional value for animals
**Conclusion**
Choosing the right bale size and characteristics for your TMR mixer is essential for optimizing efficiency and meeting nutritional needs. By considering factors such as hay density, processing time, and mixer dimensions, you can make an informed decision that will enhance the performance of your feeding system.
**For more information, visit www.leo-ag.com**
**Disclaimer:**
This article was written by AI and the information within may be incorrect. Always consult a LEO professional for accurate information. If any trademarks have been used, they do not manufacture, distribute, or endorse these parts.
Key Words: TMR Mixers, Bale Size, Bale Characteristics, Hay Density, Mixture Efficiency, Mixer Capacity, Bale Weight, Mixer Dimensions, Number of Augers, Vertical TMR, Feed Mixer, Manure Spreader, LEO Agriculture
If trademarks have been used in this AI article they do not belong to FMK and the represented company does not manufacture, distribute or endorse these parts.